Skip to main content

Compare Leaderboards Insights

Loading...

Compare LLM models by quality, speed, and price. Find the right model for your use case.

Product

Explore Models
Compare
Leaderboards
LLM Selector
Cost Calculator
Provider Finder

Resources

Insights
FAQ
About
Methodology

Data Sources

Data sourced via public APIs from Artificial Analysis, OpenRouter, and HuggingFace. FindLLM is an independent aggregator, not affiliated with these providers.

© 2026 FindLLM. All rights reserved.

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) — Anthropic | FindLLM

Home
Explore
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

Back to Explore

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

Anthropic·Released 2026-02-05

Multimodal

Model Family

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)2026-02-17 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)2026-02-17 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort)2026-02-17 Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)2026-02-05 Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)2025-11-24 Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)2025-11-24 Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)2025-10-15 Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)2025-10-15

Quality Index

53.0

4th of 442

Top 1%

Coding Index

48.1

7th of 352

Top 2%

Price/1M

$10.00

654th cheapest

3126% above median

Top 97%

Speed

47 tok/s

Top 49%

TTFT

6.58s

Market Position

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)Market Average

Pricing

Input

$5.00

per 1M tokens

Output

$25.00

per 1M tokens

Blended

$10.00

per 1M tokens

Cheaper than 3% of models. Median price is $0.31/1M tokens.

Cost Calculator

Tokens per day1M

100K100M

Daily

$10.00

Monthly

$300.00

vs. Similar Models

GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)Q:+1.0

$4.81-52%

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)Q:-1.3

$6.00-40%

GPT-5.2 (xhigh)Q:-1.7

$4.81-52%

GLM-5 (Reasoning)Q:-3.2

$1.55-85%

Performance

47

tokens/sec

Faster than 51% of models

6.58

seconds

Faster than 8% of models

6.58

seconds

Faster than 24% of models

Market Median

46 tok/s

3% faster

Median TTFT

0.42s

1474% slower

Throughput/Dollar

5

tok/s per $/1M

Speed Comparison

Qwen3 Max (Preview)

47 tok/s-0%

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct

47 tok/s+0%

Llama 3 Instruct 70B

46 tok/s-1%

Benchmarks

MMLU-ProNot evaluated

GPQA Diamond

89.6%

HLE

36.7%

LiveCodeBenchNot evaluated

SciCode

51.9%

TerminalBench Hard

46.2%

MATH-500Not evaluated

AIMENot evaluated

AIME 2025Not evaluated

IFBench

53.1%

Long Context Recall

70.7%

Tau2

92.1%

Market AverageTop Score

Quick Compare

Similar Models

GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)

OpenAI

Q: 54.0$4.81/1M400K ctx

Faster: 42%Cheaper: 52%

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

Anthropic

Q: 51.7$6.00/1M

GPT-5.2 (xhigh)

OpenAI

Q: 51.3$4.81/1M400K ctx

Faster: 44%Cheaper: 52%

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Z AI

Q: 49.8$1.55/1M80K ctx

Faster: 91%Cheaper: 84%

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)

Anthropic

Q: 49.7$10.00/1M

Faster: 17%Quality: -3.3

MiniMax-M2.7

MiniMax

Q: 49.6$0.53/1M205K ctx

Cheaper: 95%Quality: -3.4

Compare all 7 models